{"id":12373,"date":"2017-11-23T14:05:55","date_gmt":"2017-11-23T12:05:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/drikkes.com\/?p=12373"},"modified":"2017-11-23T14:05:55","modified_gmt":"2017-11-23T12:05:55","slug":"notes-kw-4717","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drikkes.com\/?p=12373","title":{"rendered":"Notes KW 47\/17"},"content":{"rendered":"
aus: How I Got My Attention Back \u00b7 Wired \u00b7 by Craig Mod <\/a><\/p>\n

\n It\u2019s become common to talk of the \u201cweaponization\u201d of attention. As in: The attention of Americans was weaponized to make facts out of falsities. I think this framing does a disservice to the crux of the problem. It\u2019s not that our attention has been weaponized, a word that vanishes in hyperbole, but rather, mechanized. As in: Our attentions have been wrest from our control, like a flock of android starlings, or a million IP enabled toasters. We were reasonably autonomous things. Now we\u2019re indifferently synchronous, easily manipulated.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Obigen Text habe ich tats\u00e4chlich komplett gelesen, von vorne bis hinten. Hat sich r\u00fcckblickend allerdings nicht ganz gelohnt. Das obige Zitat ist schon der Hitparagraph aus einem ansonsten recht vorhersehbaren Artikel.<\/p>\n